Post by account_disabled on Jan 2, 2024 8:25:16 GMT
A Fundamental rights and freedoms from title II Fundamental rights freedoms and duties from the Constitution. Or as it appears from the conclusion of the referral the author of the exception of unconstitutionality did not specifymention specifically which is the fundamental right claimed to be violated and in respect of which the alleged restriction operates through the provisions of art. para. the final sentence and of art. para. from Law no. regarding the insolvency procedure. On the other hand regarding.
The modification or interpretation of the Country Email List criticized legal provisions the Court observes that according to art. para. from Law no. The Constitutional Court pronounces only on the constitutionality of the acts with respect to which it was notified without being able to modify or complete the provisions subject to control. . Distinct from these regarding the mention by the parties present before the constitutional court respectively the addition of other constitutional grounds in support of the exception of unconstitutionality the.
Court observes that according to its consistent jurisprudence for example Decision no. of July published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of place only within the limits determined by the conclusion of referral without these being able to be modified by any of the parties. Therefore invoking before the Court other grounds of unconstitutionality than those shown by raising the exception of unconstitutionality before the court grounds which were not retained in the conclusion of referral pronounced by the court is inadmissible. . For the stated reasons pursuant to art. lit. d and of art. para. of the Constitution as well as of art. of art. paragraph lit. Ad and of art. of Law no. with unanimity of votes CONSTITUTIONAL COURT In the name of the law DECIDES It rejects as.
The modification or interpretation of the Country Email List criticized legal provisions the Court observes that according to art. para. from Law no. The Constitutional Court pronounces only on the constitutionality of the acts with respect to which it was notified without being able to modify or complete the provisions subject to control. . Distinct from these regarding the mention by the parties present before the constitutional court respectively the addition of other constitutional grounds in support of the exception of unconstitutionality the.
Court observes that according to its consistent jurisprudence for example Decision no. of July published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of place only within the limits determined by the conclusion of referral without these being able to be modified by any of the parties. Therefore invoking before the Court other grounds of unconstitutionality than those shown by raising the exception of unconstitutionality before the court grounds which were not retained in the conclusion of referral pronounced by the court is inadmissible. . For the stated reasons pursuant to art. lit. d and of art. para. of the Constitution as well as of art. of art. paragraph lit. Ad and of art. of Law no. with unanimity of votes CONSTITUTIONAL COURT In the name of the law DECIDES It rejects as.